January 11, 2017

Oddities of all kinds (1)



Well, dear followers. I don’t know about you,  but I must confess I recognized myself as sufering form the illness I describe in today’s post. But let’s not waste the time and proceed with the post:Bibliomania


Have you ever heard about an illness called Bibliomania? Neither have I. Yet, this dark desire for books infected Europe in the 1800s. Book lovers and collectors feared becoming a victim of the pseudo-illness.

Book collectors and bibliophiles described “bibliomania” as a medical condition. “Any obsession can become real disease,” says David Fernández, rare book librarian at Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library at the University of Toronto.

The social elite and scholars did everything they could to obtain and collect books—no matter the price. Some collectors spent their entire fortunes to build their personal libraries. While it was never medically classified, people in the 1800s truly feared bibliomania. There are several written accounts, fictional and real, of bibliomania, but the most famous and bizarre documentation is by Reverend Thomas Frognell Dibdin, an English book lover and victim of the neurosis. In 1809 he published Bibliomania -  or Book Madness- a series of strange, rambling fictional dialogues based on conversations and real collectors Dibdin had encountered.
 The first edition of Bibliomania; or Book Madness published in 1809 is regarded as one of the most famous descriptions of bibliomania and book collecting in the 1800s. The Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library, University of Toronto
David Fernández , speaking about this book states,  “I think a very good word to describe the book is that it’s very bizarre.” He says it after studying his library’s preserved copy of the 1809 first edition. “It’s a product of the generation in which it appears.” On the title page of the book, an engraving depicts a “book fool,” a character originally featured in the 1498 book, Ship of Fools, the first work of fiction to reference the discovery of the new world. That character is described as a vain book collector, the story touching on madness among scholars and collectors, explains Fernández.

According to Reverend Dibdin, the author of this strange book, the “book-plague” had reached its height in Paris and London in 1789. After the French Revolution in 1799, French aristocrats sold their estates to flee from the country and many private libraries emptied their shelves.
 A bibliophile caring for his extensive collection, painted by Carl Spitzweg in 1850. Public Domain


Men and some women collectors purchased books to conserve and preserve Europe’s literary heritage, while others did so as a symbol of wealth and power. At this time, constructing books was a delicate and laborious art completed by hand—from cutting the paper to creating the binding—which added value.
Dibdin points out eight particular types of books that collectors obsessed over: first editions, true editions, black letter printed books, large paper copies; uncut books with edges that are not sheared by binder’s tools; illustrated copies; unique copies with morocco binding or silk lining; and copies printed on vellum.


Some contemporary scholars have linked bibliomania with obsessive compulsive disorder. “The pleasure that hoarders take in collecting can be so profound that it might define a person’s self-image and even give the individual a life purpose.”

 Reverend Dibbin’s Bibliomania was widely popular among Dibdin’s fellow book lovers, with collectors getting in reckless bidding wars at auctions over a copy. The book is said to have spurred a 42-day auction at the 1817 Roxburghe sale.



January 3, 2017

Writing Tips (XXI) Internal Dialogue: Italics or Quotes?


I've wondered about the  internal monologue considered the key to a great story.  A pretty clear answer I found in Stephen King's famous On Writing. He describes here the writer’s toolbox. Vocabulary, punctuation, grammar, showing not telling  are tools to be found in the top level of an author's toolbox.
 
Internal monologue - the thoughts, dreams, stream-of-consciousness stuff inside a character’s mind only the reader is privy to -  is a tool in the bottom half of any author's toolbox.
It happens through all points of view – first person, third person, omniscient.
 Many people  think in at least partial sentences, talk themselves into and out of all kinds of things, they weigh consequences, wrestle with past experiences all in their head in a split second.
Without internal monologue, understanding what the character is struggling with – how they arrive at their decisions – what motivates them, it’s very difficult for a reader to connect emotionally.
But what should we use in rendering internal dialogue - italics or quotes?

Internal monologue is used by authors to indicate what a character is thinking.
Direct internal monologue refers to a character thinking the exact thoughts as written, often in the first person. (The first person singular is I, the first person plural is we.)
Example: “I cheated her,” David thought, “but maybe she will forgive me.”
Notice that quotation marks and other punctuation are used as if the character had spoken aloud.
You may also use italics without quotation marks for direct internal monologue.
Example: I cheated her, David thought, but maybe she will forgive me.
Indirect internal monologue/dialogue refers to a character expressing a thought in the third person (the third person singular is he or she, the plural is they) and is not set off with either italics or quotation marks.
Example: Lara wondered why David would think that she would forgive him so easily.
The sense of the sentence tells us that she did not think these exact words.


Refining your story's internal monologue is best taken care of in the editing process, but there are a few things you can do in the first draft to help guide what you put in and what you don't:
 -  Leave off the "he thought" or "she thought." If you're deep in your POV character's head, there's no need for it.
 - Use italics sparingly. Many new writers are under the impression that internal monologue should be italicized, but that gets old quickly.